This
week we experimented with game theory using “The Prisoner’s Dilemma.” We found
out that the Nash Equilibrium occurs when each player acts in his/her own best
interest no matter what the other does. Even though there are communication
between the two groups, each group still didn’t trust each other to not to
confess, because they believed that other would betray them and made them get
more years in jail. Most of the time, people make rational decisions, thinking
about the benefits and the cost of different decision. However, sometimes
people had a sudden whim to do something without thinking much. Therefore they
might end up having in a worse situation. In our experiment, both group got the
same amount of years for jail but the years weren’t the least. If in all
rounds, each group were to stay quiet, we wouldn’t have that many years in jail.
Therefore in this case, bad outcome is always inevitable. People try to avoid
bad outcome, but sometimes it just happens due to the dishonesty of other group
or wrong decision. For example, in communication, you might tell the other
group that two of you would stay quiet to get the better outcome. However,
during the decision making, each group might not trust what other had said
earlier. This caused them to confess. If the other group doesn’t confess, that
group will get more years in jail. Trust is what makes a better outcome.
Monday, December 17, 2012
Saturday, December 8, 2012
Topic 15: What is Monopoly
What is monopoly? A monopoly is single firm of a good for
which there isn’t any substitutes. There should also be high barriers to entry,
which other firms cannot enter the market easily and provide the good.
Monopolies are often created because of legal barriers such as patent laws. The
monopoly has control both over the quantity produced and price charged; it also
faces he entire demand curve for the good produced. Therefore, it will face a
downward-sloping demand curve. It follows the general rule for profit
maximization, MR=MC. As the monopolist does not know exactly how much consumers
are willing to buy at particular prices, it must look for the optimum price. In
the video, one comentor mentions some of the problems with monopolies, but he
says that those aren’t what economists are concerned with. The problem refers
to the inefficiency and the efficiency of the monopolies, because sometimes the
deadweight lost arises. Monopolies are often looked at as bad, but they can
also considered good because the average cost decreases in monopolies, which can
produce a large enough of product. If given that in the long run monopolists
spend all of their surplus in maintaining their monopoly position, I wouldn’t
think it’s worthwhile to attain a monopoly because their won’t be an economic
profit.
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Topic 14 : Productivity Experiment
In the experiment that we did in class was to demonstrate
the law of diminish return. We tried to produce widgets (those paper rings). At
first, there was only one labor. As the labor gradually increases, the products
increase. However, the more the labor gets, the products start to decrease due
the law of diminish return. This happens because the labor might not have
enough equipment and the spaces are limited. Therefore people have to share the
equipment and squeeze in the same limited space, which reduces the efficiency.
There were many problems when producing widgets. I think the
main cause was that the manager didn’t carefully plan how the factory should
run. Therefore in the beginning, people weren’t cooperating but just did there
own products. Because of improper management, the number of products was quite
messed up. I believe that for the company to improve productivity in the
short-run, it’s number of labor should be well controlled, not too many and not
to few. As for long run, there should be more capital, increasing the equipment
and space. It seems that this experiment actually did symbolize the real life
situation, because sometimes we produced really bad products due to the inconsistent
skills.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
Journal Topic 13: The Return of the Zeppelin
After
seventy years, Zeppelin airships are coming back. However, technologies have
improved their qualities. Now they are using helium instead of hydrogen. This
airship is one of the three in the world. Therefore the market structure is
oligopoly. Few markets compete with each other. Today, people might think that
Airship is really unique that they want to try out at least one since there
hasn’t been any airship up on the sky for a long time. Also, people’s income
has increased over the years, which cause them to willing to pay to ride the
Airship. The demand therefore will increase. Other determinants or variables
that caused the increase of demand might be that the population increases, price
of a substitute rises such as airplanes, the expected future price of an energy
bar rises, and etc. Well, I think I might want to try to go on a airship travel
once in my life, since it’s a rare thing do it. I think it’s quite expensive to
do go on it. However, besides from the cost, I will like to look at the word in
a different view. It seems that being inside an Airship is just way too cool. I
think it will just be an experience for me.
Monday, October 29, 2012
Journal Topic 12: Pizza for Pesos?
In the video “Pizza for Pesos”, it talked
about Pizza Patron accepting both pesos and US dollars. It raised some controversies.
For example some said that this benefit the illegal immigration from Mexico
because people believe by doing that it is catering to the illegal immigrant
market and weakening American culture. This video eventually deals with
utility, because when people buy things, they need to concern the benefit of
buying it, whether buying pizza in pesos or American dollars increase their
utility. This concept therefore deals with consumer preference. Consumers
choose what benefit them the most. For illegal immigrants, they might think
that buying using pesos is better because they don’t need to exchange money. As
for Americans, they might choose to use US dollars. A change in the exchange
rate between Mexican Pesos and US Dollars would definitely have affect on Pizza
Patron’s business, because people prefer the cheaper money. Moreover, when the
value of the money decreases and the other remain the same, people buy less.
Therefore their budget line shifts inward. However, when the value of the money
increases it goes the other way around. I believe that using pesos might
increase the chance of illegal immigrant, because they can cross the border and
buy food without even changing the money.
Monday, October 22, 2012
Journal Topic 11: Brand Names and Utility
After
watching the video on “No Frills Grocery Shopping,” I was quite shocked. I never
know that there were actually grocery stores that sell products that have no big
name brans. Moreover, customer’s annual household income is $65,000. For me, I
believe that big brand names have a higher utility or sense of satisfaction.
Even though it might be more expensive, I believe that those big brands taste
better that’s why they became famous. Another issue I really considered is the
quality and how those products were made. I believe that those private brand
names are more likely to have problems in their process of making the products.
In addition, their raw materials might not be as good as those in the big
brand. I feel that it’s safer to buy things from big brands. However, some
times, I actually choose the ones that cheaper. Those are the things I just buy
once in a while. If I have to use one specific thing a lot of time, I probably
will buy products from big brands, because I wouldn’t want to risk my health
since in news, it often says that private brand has some sanitation problems. For
example, I wouldn’t want to buy a random brand chocolate from a store, because
most of the time it’s not delicious at all. I would prefer M&M, which gives
the most utility for me.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Journal Topic 10: Consumer Preference and Utility - Skechers
Skechers is an athletic shoe company that started in 1992
and is one of the well-recognized shoe companies. They target on customer
needs, choose the right style, and are used limited resources to provide
customer good qualities of shoes. The company do market research to evaluate
consumer needs by analyzes the process of customers. It promotes through
personal selling, sales promotion (short term), public relations, and
advertising, which contains all form of media. For example, their products are
in magazines, TV shows, internet, and all other media. Skechers uses target
market, which target people between ages of 12 and 24. In identifying market
segments to target the right customers, it uses geographical, demographic,
psychographic, and product needs. It also differentiates itself from other shoe
companies by investing time that builds the brand that carries lifestyle and
cool footwear. It also assures maximum distribution potential without
overreaching its market.
There are a lot of products that have high utility and there
are those that have really low utility for me. For example, I spent a lot of
money on chocolate, because they are just way too delicious. Chocolate just
makes my day happy. However, diamonds for me has a low utility. I don’t get the
point of diamonds. They are shiny, but you can’t do anything with it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)